🚗
Chevrolet · Auto · 2025
Chevrolet Corvette
89
6 complaints
status.verdict
status.safe
status.safe_sub
product.specifications
specs.g_fuel_economy
specs.city_mpg16
specs.highway_mpg25
specs.combined_mpg19
specs.annual_fuel_cost$3650
specs.ghg_score4 / 10
specs.g_engine_drivetrain
specs.engine_size6.2 L
specs.cylinders8
specs.fuel_typePremium Gasoline
specs.transmissionAutomatic (S8)
specs.drivetrainRear-Wheel Drive
CO₂471 g/mi
specs.g_classification
specs.vehicle_classTwo Seaters

specs.data_sourced_from FuelEconomy.gov (specs.energy_dept)

product.complaints_section6 total
CHEVROLET CORVETTE 2025 SEATS
critical
The heated seat option burned the seat right thru. It’s a fire hazard because the wiring for the heated seats burned right through the cloth seat. so you have a wire issue under a combustible material like the clothing material in a car seat.
NHTSAUSApr 2026Source →
CHEVROLET CORVETTE 2025 SERVICE BRAKES
medium
On 3/21/2026 @ approximately 1:45 PM I was driving down a local road @ approximately 25MPH. While approaching a stop sign, I attempted to stop the vehicle, I applied the brakes and the brake pedal dropped serval inches and became hard felt like it hit the floor of the vehicle. The vehicle continued through the intersection. **There was NO warning message before the vehicle brakes failed to function as designed** There were children attempting to cross the street at the intersection, I blew my horn to alert the children, thank God that they Stopped and did not hit by the car. After the vehicle was brought to a stop there was a message Brake system failure.
NHTSAUSMar 2026Source →
CHEVROLET CORVETTE 2025 SEATS
high
The contact owns a 2025 Chevrolet Corvette. The contact stated that there was a strong chemical odor coming from the seats. The contact had experienced headaches, burning eyes, respiratory issues, and inflamed lungs. The contact stated that he had temporarily stopped driving the vehicle, and upon driving the vehicle a month later, the contact became aware that the strong chemical odor was the cause of the injuries. The contact had received medical assistance and a new inhaler. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, where the contact was informed that the strong chemical odor would dissipate after some time. The contact stated that the issue could cause significant health problems in the meantime. The contact had stopped driving the vehicle. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not contacted. The failure mileage was approximately 25.
NHTSAUSFeb 2026Source →
CHEVROLET CORVETTE 2025 WHEELS
medium
When having the stock tires changed to all-season tires, the technician found a rear wheel with 2 cracks in the inside bead area. Car had about 8500 miles and an inspection of the old tires showed no damage to the tread or sidewall. No leaking had been noted.
NHTSAUSSept 2025Source →
CHEVROLET CORVETTE 2025 FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
high
Please refer to Part 573 Safety Recall Report 25V536. This report seeks to bring to the attention of the NHTSA that additional General Motors, LLC Chevrolet Corvette Models NOT INCLUDED in the Recall Report are virtually identical in design and having the identical safety issue. THE ISSUE: Excess fuel spilled into the fuel filler pocket drains directly into the left-side fan equipped air intake. The air intake is equipped with a thermostatically controlled fan that remains running after engine shutdown if the engine temperature trigger threshold is met. While Safety Recall 25V536 limits the issue to those models equipped with a "radiator/fan combination", to exclude the "fan only" models (Stingray Z51 Equipped in particular) from the recall due to not containing an "ignition source" is short-sighted to state the least in my opinion. Any electric motor is an ignition source as power (typically 12VDC in an automobile) is delivered through "brushes" to an armature that excites the magnetic fields between opposing magnets. The assumption that the addition of a radiator (essentially a sealed cavity have no spark potential) creates an ignition source combination is short-sighted at the least and criminally negligent at best. I am the owner of a 2025 Stingray with a Z51 package. After reviewing 25V536, I conducted a test on my vehicle by pouring water into the fuel filler pocket and monitored where that water went. The test results made it clear to me that to exclude the Stingray is a mistake. Video test results are attached.
NHTSAUSAug 2025Source →
product.discussion0 product.comments
product.no_discussion
product.status_history
status.certifiedstatus.safe6 Jun 2026
Lemon Score: 89. 6 data points. v3 scoring.
status.uncertainstatus.certified31 May 2026
Lemon Score: 92. 3 data points. v3 scoring.
product.had_issue
product.help_others
product.submit_complaint